Trauma of life is passed down in SPERM, affecting mental health of future generations | Mail Online

How the trauma of life is passed down in SPERM, affecting the mental health of future generations

The changes are so strong they can even influence a man’s grandchildren

They make the offspring more prone to conditions like bipolar disorder

By EMMA INNES

PUBLISHED: 15:29 GMT, 23 April 2014 | UPDATED: 15:42 GMT, 23 April 2014

53

View comments

+2

When a man is traumatised changes occur in his sperm which are passed on to his children

The children of people who have experienced extremely traumatic events are more likely to develop mental health problems.

And new research shows this is because experiencing trauma leads to changes in the sperm.

These changes can cause a man’s children to develop bipolar disorder and are so strong they can even influence the man’s grandchildren.

Psychologists have long known that traumatic experiences can induce behavioural disorders that are passed down from one generation to the next.

However, they are only just beginning to understand how this happens.

Researchers at the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich now think they have come one step closer to understanding how the effects of traumas can be passed down the generations.

The researchers found that short RNA molecules – molecules that perform a wide range of vital roles in the body – are made from DNA by enzymes that read specific sections of the DNA and use them as template to produce corresponding RNAs.

Other enzymes then trim these RNAs into mature forms.

Cells naturally contain a large number of different short RNA molecules called microRNAs.

They have regulatory functions, such as controlling how many copies of a particular protein are made.

More…

‘Not tonight dear, I’ve got a headache’: Women ARE more likely to go off sex when they are in pain

Want your kids to behave? CHOP UP their apple: Children are naughtier when they bite chunks out of food, study claims

The researchers studied the number and kind of microRNAs expressed by adult mice exposed to traumatic conditions in early life and compared them with non-traumatised mice.

They discovered that traumatic stress alters the amount of several microRNAs in the blood, brain and sperm – while some microRNAs were produced in excess, others were lower than in the corresponding tissues or cells of control animals.

These alterations resulted in misregulation of cellular processes normally controlled by these microRNAs.

After traumatic experiences, the mice behaved markedly differently – they partly lost their natural aversion to open spaces and bright light and showed symptoms of depression.

+2

Men who have experienced traumatic events are more likely to have children with mental health problems

These behavioural symptoms were also transferred to the next generation via sperm, even though the offspring were not exposed to any traumatic stress themselves.

The metabolisms of the offspring of stressed mice were also impaired – their insulin and blood sugar levels were lower than in the offspring of non-traumatised parents.

‘We were able to demonstrate for the first time that traumatic experiences affect metabolism in the long-term and that these changes are hereditary,’ said Professor Isabelle Mansuy.

‘With the imbalance in microRNAs in sperm, we have discovered a key factor through which trauma can be passed on.’

However, certain questions remain open, such as how the dysregulation in short RNAs comes about.

Professor Mansuy said: ‘Most likely, it is part of a chain of events that begins with the body producing too many stress hormones.’

Importantly, acquired traits other than those induced by trauma could also be inherited through similar mechanisms, the researcher suspects.

via Trauma of life is passed down in SPERM, affecting mental health of future generations | Mail Online.

America must reckon with its original sin of slavery

America must reckon with its original sin of slavery

ESTHER J. CEPEDA 2:53 p.m. PDT July 14, 2014

(Photo: Washington Post Writers Group )

1

CONNECT

TWEET

LINKEDIN

COMMENT

EMAIL

MORE

CHICAGO — In his 2004 book “The Presumed Alliance: The Unspoken Conflict Between Latinos and Blacks and What It Means for America,” author Nicolas C. Vaca shatters the myth of a Rainbow Coalition among minorities.

Paraphrasing Latino activist Daniel Osuna, Vaca notes that though, in theory, “Latinos and blacks have parallel histories of suffering at the hands of white America, and that they also share a history of struggling to obtain social, economic, and educational opportunities,” it pretty much ends there. “In the real world the ostensible moral and philosophical bases for coalition politics have largely fallen apart because of competing self-interests,” Vaca wrote.

Parallel, as in side by side, yes. But not exactly equivalent.

This distinction came to mind as I read Manuel Roig-Franzia’s Washington Post profile of Ta-Nehisi Coates, a writer for The Atlantic and author of the blockbuster cover story “The Case for Reparations.”

Here’s the part that made my eyeballs bug out of my head:

“But what also has been notable is the reaction of like-minded readers to the piece, which took two years to complete,” wrote Roig-Franzia. “Everywhere he goes, Coates hears versions of the same plea: What about my group? What about Native Americans? What about Latino immigrants? What about me?”

Coates tells Roig-Franzia one morning at a Capitol Hill coffee shop: “You get here and people say, ‘Why can’t you do that for our community?’” Coates “calls the reaction ‘disrespectful’ but ‘not illogical.’ Disrespectful because he believes the experience of blacks in America deserves its own, focused examination. Not illogical because he can empathize with the desire of people who feel wronged.”

It is remarkably brave that a prominent African-American intellectual would buck the tyranny of political correctness and say, basically: Hey, let’s not compare apples and oranges here — a sentiment I heartily agree with.

“When I said ‘disrespectful,’ I didn’t mean to me, personally,” Coates told me in a telephone interview. “What I meant was disrespect to one particular people. I spent two years of my life studying this; it wasn’t some simple petition for reparations. It’s very much rooted in a specific African-American experience. It’s not simply about people who are not white, or people who are victims of oppression, but about a specific period of our history.”

Coates elaborated, “I could almost see Japanese-Americans make a case because of their internment or the Native Americans, but I just d

via America must reckon with its original sin of slavery.